UNCOMMON GROUND -9780262122306 絕版英文設計書 [建築人設計人的店-上博圖書] 價格比較,價格查詢,價格歷史信息

[注意]

1 本店只販售正品，絕不賣仿冒品，請安心購買。

2 下標前可以蝦皮聊聊是否商品有現貨。

3 下單前請再次確認選購的商品款式，商品須保持全新，並於取貨後15天內提出。若經拆封、使用後導致商品缺乏完整性，恕不提供退貨服務。

[商品資訊]

by DAVID LEATHERBARROW

Hardcover： 297頁

出版社： The MIT Press (2000 )

語言： English

ISBN-10： 0-262-12230-8

ISBN-13： 9780262122306

[商品內容]

Although both are central to architecture, siting and construction are often treated as separate domains. In Uncommon Ground, David Leatherbarrow illuminates their relationship, focusing on the years between 1930 and 1960, when utopian ideas about the role of technology in building gave way to an awareness of its disruptive impact on cities and culture. He examines the work of three architects, Richard Neutra, Antonin Raymond, and Aris Konstantinidis, who practiced in the United States, Japan, and Greece respectively.Leatherbarrow rejects the assumption that buildings of the modern period, particularly those that used the latest technology, were designed without regard to their surroundings. Although the prefabricated elements used in the buildings were designed independent of siting considerations, architects used these elements to modulate the environment. Leatherbarrow shows how the role of walls, the traditional element of architectural definition and platform partition, became less significant than that of the platforms themselves, the floors, ceilings, and intermediate levels. He shows how frontality was replaced by the building's four-sided extension into its surroundings, resulting in frontal configurations previously characteristic of the back. Arguing that the boundary between inside and outside was radically redefined, Leatherbarrow challenges cherished notions about the autonomy of the architectural object and about regional coherence. Modern architectural topography, he suggests, is an interplay of buildings, landscapes, and cities, as well as the humans who use them.The conflict between technological progress and cultural continuity, Leatherbarrow claims, exists only in theory, not in the real world of architecture. He argues that the act of building is not a matter of restoring regional identity by re-creating familiar signs, but of incorporating construction into the process of topography's perpetual becoming.